Impact of Genotypic Resistance Testing on Selection of Salvage Regimen in Clinical Practice

Author:

Haupts Stefan1,Ledergerber Bruno1,Böni Jürg2,Schüpbach Jörg2,Kronenberg Andreas1,Opravil Milos1,Flepp Markus1,Speck Roberto F1,Grube Christina1,Rentsch Katharina3,Weber Rainer1,Günthard Huldrych F1,Bachmann S,Battegay M,Bernasconi E,Bucher H,Bürgisser Ph,Egger M,Erb P,Fierz W,Fischer M,Flepp M4,Francioli P5,Furrer HJ,Gorgievski M,Günthard H,Grob P,Hirschel B,Kaiser L,Kind C,Klimkait Th,Ledergerber B,Lauper U,Opravil M,Paccaud F,Pantaleo G,Perrin L,Piffaretti J-C,Rickenbach M6,Rudin C7,Schupbach J,Speck R,Telenti A,Trkola A,Vernazza P8,Weber R,Yerly S,

Affiliation:

1. Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

2. Swiss National Center for Retroviruses, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

3. Institute for Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

4. (Chairman of the Clinical and Laboratory Committee)

5. (President of the SHCS, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, CH-1011, Lausanne)

6. (Head of Data Center)

7. (Chairman of the Mother & Child Substudy)

8. (Chairman of the Scientific Board)

Abstract

ObjectiveTo determine whether genotypic resistance testing leads to selection of more potent drug regimens when compared to regimens based on treatment history only.DesignProspective, tertiary care centre-based study. Patients: One-hundred-and-forty-five HIV-infected adults on stable antiretroviral therapy (ART) for >6 months experiencing virological failure.MethodsThe physicians’ decision-making process when choosing a salvage regimen was prospectively documented: at time of virological failure, on ‘failing ART’, genotyping was performed and a hypothetical ‘clinical expert ART’ based upon patient's drug history was documented. Subsequently, data on resistance mutations, rating by a decision support software and drug history were used to define ‘genotyping ART’. After discussion with the patient, final treatment, ‘new personalized ART’ was chosen and prescribed. To compare the relative potency of the four ART regimens in a standardized manner, a resistance score ranging from 1 (best) to 8 (worst) based on drug ranking by decision support software was attributed to each ART regimen. Virological and immunological outcomes were analysed based on the magnitude of the resistance score.ResultsMedian follow-up was 1.5 years. In all 145 patients, median resistance scores for the stepwise selected ART regimens were: ‘failing ART’: 4.5, ‘clinical expert ART’: 1.8, ‘genotyping ART’: 1.5 and ‘new personalized ART’: 2. The latter was 1.5 in patients who effectively switched to ‘new personalized ART’ ( n=89). Lower resistance scores translated into significantly improved virological response after initiation of ‘new personalized ART’. In multivariable analysis, lower resistance scores, lower baseline HIV RNA levels and use of novel antiretroviral drugs were associated with the probability of reducing plasma viraemia to <50 copies/ml. Conclusions: This study suggests that treatment choices including genotype and decision support software were virologically superior to those based on drug history only.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3