Selection Bias in Web Surveys and the Use of Propensity Scores

Author:

Schonlau Matthias1,van Soest Arthur2,Kapteyn Arie3,Couper Mick4

Affiliation:

1. RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,

2. Tilburg University, Netherlands

3. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California

4. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Abstract

Web surveys are a popular survey mode, but the subpopulation with Internet access may not represent the population of interest. The authors investigate whether adjusting using weights or matching on a small set of variables makes the distributions of target variables representative of the population. This application has a rich sampling design; the Internet sample is part of an existing probability sample, the Health and Retirement Study, that is representative of the U.S. population aged 50 and older. For the dichotomous variables investigated, the adjustment helps. On average, the sample means in the Internet access sample differ by 6.5 percent before and 3.7 percent after adjustment. Still, a large number of adjusted estimates remain significantly different from their target estimates based on the complete sample. This casts doubt on the common procedure to use only a few variables to correct for the selectivity of convenience samples.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference46 articles.

1. On representative social capital

2. The Advent of Internet Surveys for Political Research: A Comparison of Telephone and Internet Samples

3. Human Research and Data Collection via the Internet

4. Blumberg, Stephen J., Julian V. Luke, and Marcie L. Cynamon . 2004. ``Has Cord-Cutting Cut Into Random-Digit-Dialed Health Surveys? The Prevalence and Impact of Wireless Substitution'' Pp. 137-42 in Eighth Conference on Health Survey Research Methods, edited by S. B. Cohen and J. M. Lepkowski. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

Cited by 178 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Second phase: The activation stage;The Normalization of the Radical Right;2024-09-02

2. First phase: The latency equilibrium;The Normalization of the Radical Right;2024-09-02

3. Reported vote: An observational measure of political stigma;The Normalization of the Radical Right;2024-09-02

4. Dedication;The Normalization of the Radical Right;2024-09-02

5. Additional materials and analyses;The Normalization of the Radical Right;2024-09-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3