Comparison of Artificial Intelligence-Based Machine Learning Classifiers for Early Detection of Keratoconus

Author:

Mohammadpour Mehrdad12ORCID,Heidari Zahra32ORCID,Hashemi Hassan2ORCID,Yaseri Mehdi4,Fotouhi Akbar4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Ophthalmology, Farabi Eye Hospital and Eye Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2. Noor Ophthalmology Research Center, Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran

3. Department of Rehabilitation Science, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran

4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Purpose To compare the agreement between artificial intelligence (AI)-based classifiers and clinical experts in categorizing normal cornea from ectatic conditions. Methods Prospective diagnostic test study at Noor Eye Hospital. Two hundred twelve eyes of 212 patients were categorized into three groups of 92 normal, 52 subclinical keratoconus (SKCN), and 68 KCN eyes based on clinical findings by 3 independent expert examiners. All cases were then categorized using four different classifiers: Pentacam Belin/Ambrosio enhanced ectasia total deviation value (BADD) and Topographic Keratoconus Classification (TKC), Sirius Phoenix, and OPD-Scan III Corneal Navigator. The performance of classifiers and their agreement with expert opinion were investigated using the sensitivity, specificity, and Kappa index (κ). Results For detecting SKCN, Phoenix had the highest agreement with the clinical diagnosis (sensitivity, specificity, and κ of 84.62%, 90.0%, and 0.70, respectively) followed by BADD (55.56%, 86.08%, 0.42), TKC (26.92%, 97.50%, 0.30), and Corneal Navigator (30.77%, 93.75%, 0.29). For KCN diagnosis, the highest agreement with expert opinion was seen for Phoenix (80.02%, 96.60%, 0.79), BADD (95.59%, 85.42%, 0.75), TKC (95.59%, 84.03%, 0.73), and Corneal Navigator (67.65%, 96.45%, 0.68). Analysis of different classifiers showed that Phoenix had the highest accuracy for differentiating KCN (91.24%) and SKCN (88.68%) compared to other classifiers. Conclusions Although AI-based classifiers, especially Sirius Phoenix, can be very helpful in detecting early keratoconus, they cannot replace clinical experts’ opinions, particularly for decision-making before refractive surgery. Albeit, there may be concerns about the accuracy of clinical experts as well.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Ophthalmology,General Medicine

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3