Establishing core competencies, opportunities, roles and expertise for oncology social work

Author:

Zebrack Brad1ORCID,Schapmire Tara2,Otis-Green Shirley3,Nelson Krista4,Miller Nina5,Donna Donna6,Grignon Michael5

Affiliation:

1. University of Michigan School of Social Work and Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

2. University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, USA

3. Collaborative Caring, Toluca Lake, USA

4. Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, USA

5. Association of Oncology Social Work, Chicago, USA

6. Cowell Family Cancer Center, Traverse City, USA

Abstract

Summary While oncology social workers are the primary providers of psychosocial services, they vary in what they do and how they work across different cancer care settings. Standards of Practice suggest that there exists a core or universal set of activities and tasks that are grounded in the values and principles of social work and apply across all settings. The purpose of this study was to identify activities that delineate and distinguish Competencies, Opportunities, Roles and Expertise (CORE) for oncology social work. Research was conducted using Concept Mapping, a structured and prescribed approach to collecting, analyzing, and interpreting qualitative and quantitative data while engaging stakeholders in the research process. Findings An expert panel of oncology social work practitioners, academicians, and leaders in the field (n = 35) generated 91 practice behaviors that were subject to card sorting and ratings of importance. A visual map consisting of six clusters best represented the statistical fit of the data (stress value = 0.18) while maintaining the most meaningful categorization of individual statements. These six domains were as follows: Clinical Assessment and Intervention (38 items; mean importance = 3.31); Professional Advocacy and Political Action (5 items; mean importance = 3.03); Case Management and Care Coordination (16 items; mean importance = 3.02); Patient Education and Advocacy (8 items; mean importance = 2.82); Organizational Support and Service (12 items; mean importance = 2.74); Professional Education (12 items; mean importance = 2.45). Application These results may inform initiatives related to social work education and training, credentialing and certification, health policy, research and advocacy on behalf of patients, families, communities, and the profession.

Funder

University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Health (social science)

Reference44 articles.

1. Challenges Faced by Social Workers as Members of Interprofessional Collaborative Health Care Teams: Table 1:

2. American Psychosocial Oncology Society (2020). Research, Practice and Policy Imperatives for Psychosocial Care: A Roadmap in a New Era of Value-Based Cancer Care, Brentwood, TN: American Psychosocial Oncology Society.

3. Psychologic intervention improves survival for breast cancer patients

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3