A Comparison of Two Different Doses of Rectal Ketamine Added to 0.5 mg.kg-1 Midazolam and 0.02 mg.kg-1 Atropine in Infants and Young Children

Author:

Wang X.1,Zhou Z. J.1,Zhang X. F.1,Zheng S.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anaesthesia, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China

Abstract

In some circumstances, a high degree of sedation that results in a child being unconscious at the time of parental separation is desirable. We set out to investigate the efficacy and safety of a rectal premedication regimen designed to produce this increased level of sedation. Sixty-seven children aged two to 24 months were randomised into two groups. Group MK received 4 mg.kg-1 ketamine, 0.5 mg.kg-1 midazolam and 0.02 mg.kg-1 atropine and group MKK received 8 mg.kg-1 ketamine, 0.5 mg.kg-1 midazolam and 0.02 mg.kg-1 atropine per rectum. The sedation score at the time of parental separation 30 minutes after drug administration and the response to intravenous cannulation were evaluated on a four-point scale. Respiratory rate, heart rate and arterial oxygen saturation were recorded immediately before parental separation. More patients in group MKK were asleep during separation (62 vs 35%, P <0.05). Fewer patients in group MKK cried during intravenous cannulation (37 vs 68%, P <0.05). Sedation scores were significantly increased at both time points. There was no difference between groups in vital signs at the time of parental separation and no adverse respiratory events occurred during the study period. In cases where a high degree of sedation following premedication in infants and toddlers is desired, the addition of 8 mg.kg-1 ketamine to 0.5 mg.kg-1 midazolam and 0.02 mg.kg-1 atropine administered rectally is more efficacious than 4 mg.kg-1 ketamine.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3