Affiliation:
1. WZB Berlin Social Science Center, Germany
2. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
Abstract
Mass mobilization (MM) is an important driver of political change. While some citizens organize in favor of more democratic institutions, others take to the streets to support an authoritarian status quo. This article introduces measures of pro-democratic and pro-autocratic MM using expert assessments for 179 polities from 1900–2021. The data allow us to trace patterns in MM over time, across regions and regime types. We use this new data to systematically analyze the relationship between both types of mobilization and regime change. We confirm the findings of the literature on contentious democratic politics, and our analysis of autocratic mobilization allows us to make sense of the controversy in the literature on “bad actors” in civil society. We show that MM in favor of autocracy negatively affects democracy, making a case for specifying the goals of the actors involved in contentious politics to more precisely understand their impact.
Funder
H2020 European Research Council
Vetenskapsrådet
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. appendix;Electoral Commissions and Democratization in Africa;2024-09-19
2. Conclusions;Electoral Commissions and Democratization in Africa;2024-09-19
3. Electoral Commissions and Nigerian Voters;Electoral Commissions and Democratization in Africa;2024-09-19
4. Electoral Commissions and African Voters;Electoral Commissions and Democratization in Africa;2024-09-19
5. Electoral Commissions and Nigerian Elites;Electoral Commissions and Democratization in Africa;2024-09-19