Introduction of a ROTEM protocol for the management of trauma-induced coagulopathy

Author:

Spagnolello Ornella1,J Reed Matthew12ORCID,Dauncey Steve3,Timony-Nolan Emer3,Innes Catherine4,Allen Jennifer MM4,Williams Michael J5,Church Nick5,Dunn Mark JG6,Blackstock Caroline1,Nimmo Alastair F7

Affiliation:

1. Emergency Medicine Research Group Edinburgh (EMERGE), Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

2. College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK

4. SNBTS Transfusion Team, Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Edinburgh, UK

5. Centre for Liver and Digestive Disorders, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK

6. Department of Critical Care, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK

7. Department of Anaesthetics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK

Abstract

Aims Point-of-care viscoelastic tests such as rotational thrombelastometry (ROTEM) and thromboelastography (TEG) give rapid information on the kinetics of clot formation, clot strength and fibrinolysis. We developed a ROTEM algorithm for the management of trauma patients at risk of massive haemorrhage using either 5 or 10 minute EXTEM and FIBTEM ROTEM thresholds. Study aims were (a) to compare time to results for ROTEM testing versus laboratory conventional coagulation testing (CCT) and (b) to compare incidence of Trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) for our 5 and 10 minute ROTEM algorithms versus both the CCT-based European guideline algorithm and the ROTEM-based iTACTIC study algorithm, in both MT and non-MT patients. Methods Single centre, prospective, observational Emergency Department based study. All trauma patients who underwent ROTEM testing were included. Data was collected from the ROTEM Sigma machine and hospital Electronic Patient Records and analysed. Results Between April 2016 and May 2019, 57 trauma patients were enrolled. Mean age was 47.4 years (SD 19.4) and 44 patients (77.2%) were male. Eleven patients (19.3%) required massive transfusion (MT), 5 patients died in ED (8.8%) and overall in-hospital mortality was 22.8% (n = 13). Median time from admission to CCT result was 83 minutes (IQR 60–93) compared to 51 minutes (IQR 32-93; p = 0.0006) for ROTEM A5 results. This time difference was present for both MT and non-MT patients. Trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) was identified in 14 (24.5%) patients using CCT compared to 22 (38.5%) using ROTEM (p = 0.11 ns). Conclusion Our ROTEM Sigma based algorithm enables a coagulation result to be obtained faster than laboratory CCT and could lead to earlier clinical intervention.

Funder

NHS Research Scotland

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Emergency Medicine,Surgery

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3