Affiliation:
1. University of California, Berkeley
Abstract
Charter management organizations (CMOs) have increasingly had to respond to questions surrounding their organizations—particularly in the context of the broader social awakening around systemic injustices and evidence of their racially inequitable practices. This study investigated how CMOs counteracted criticisms and managed perception by characterizing their organizations as socially and racially conscious. It compared social media content for one CMO population during two time periods that surround the 2016 election: 2014 to 2016 and 2017 to 2019. Findings suggest that the CMOs have increasingly characterized themselves as socially conscious, but their attentiveness to issues of race and racism remained temporally and topically bounded. The article concludes with a discussion of how CMOs’ evolving discourse may influence public perception and considers how CMOs perpetuate a form of neoliberal multiculturalism that normalizes market reform under the discursive cover of a bounded articulation of equity and racial justice.
Funder
National Academy of Education
Spencer Foundation
Reference76 articles.
1. Annamma S. A., Jackson D. D., Morrison D. (2017). Conceptualizing color-evasiveness: Using dis/ability critical race theory to expand a color-blind racial ideology in education and society. Race Ethnicity and Education, 20(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2016.1248837
2. Baker B. D., Miron G. (2015). The business of Charter Schooling: Understanding the policies that charter operators use for financial benefit. National Education Policy Center. http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/charter-revenue
3. Baldridge B. J. (2017). “It’s like this myth of the supernegro”: Resisting narratives of damage and struggle in the neoliberal educational policy context. Race Ethnicity and Education, 20(6), 781–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2016.1248819
4. Ball S. J. (2009). Privatising education, privatising education policy, privatising educational research: Network governance and the ‘competition state. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930802419474
5. Bifulco R., Reback R. (2014). Fiscal impacts of charter schools: Lessons from New York. Education Finance and Policy, 9(1), 86–107. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00121
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献