“Bounded Equity: The Limits of Economic Models of Social Justice in Cannabis Legislation”

Author:

Hendy Katherine1ORCID,Mauri Amanda I.23,Creary Melissa3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

2. Department of Political Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

3. Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Abstract

Social equity provisions in cannabis legislation are premised on the hope that the profit generated around adult-use cannabis can be leveraged to ameliorate the damage done by racially biased enforcement of prohibition in black and brown communities. As such, they encapsulate an attempt to reconcile the history of racism in the enforcement of cannabis law through its new future as a profit generating commodity. These programs are gaining traction, but with minimal empirical examination. The development and implementation of these programs raises a number of questions in need of study that we outline in this paper. We argue that Creary’s concept of bounded justice—which critiques the inherent limitations of social justice projects that ignore structural forms of social exclusion—can provide a framework for critical understanding of the limitations of such programs, ethnographically grounded empirical research, and a framework for evaluating the justice impacts of legislation. Specifically, we argue that in order to interrogate the possibilities for social justice projects around cannabis, we must address equity at a deeper level by working with communities to investigate hyper-localized and historical factors that have influenced systems and structures.

Funder

National Human Genome Research Institute

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Law,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Health (social science)

Reference67 articles.

1. Implementing social justice in the transition from illicit to legal cannabis

2. American Civil Liberties Union. (2010). The war on marijuana in Black and White. https://www.aclu.org/report/report-war-marijuana-black-and-white

3. American Civil Liberties Union. (2020). A tale of two countries: Racially targeted arrests in the era of marijuana reform. https://www.aclu.org/sites/default/files/field_document/marijuanareport_03232021.pdf

4. An Act Concerning Regulation, Pub. L. No. 102–0098, 410 ILCS 705/10-35 (2021).

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3