The reliability, validity and clinical utility of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation – ten-item version (CORE-10) in post-acute patients with stroke

Author:

Steverson Tom1ORCID,Marsden Joseph2,Blake Joshua12

Affiliation:

1. University of East Anglia, UK

2. Norfolk Community Health and Care NHS Trust, UK

Abstract

Objective To explore the validity, reliability, and clinical utility of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation – ten-item version (CORE-10: a ten-item questionnaire designed to measure psychological distress) in a stroke inpatient sample and calculate reliable and clinically significant change scores. Setting A post-acute stroke rehabilitation ward in the East of England. Participants A total of 53 patients with stroke, capable of completing the CORE-10 as part of their routine clinical assessment. Exclusion criteria included moderate to severe aphasia and/or alexia. Main measures Alongside the CORE-10, the Patient Health Questionnaire – 9, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Centre for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale, and the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition were used as concurrent measures. Results To assess reliability, the internal consistency and test–retest reliability of the CORE-10 were calculated. The average number of days between CORE-10 test–retest administrations was 2.84 ( SD = 3.12, Mdn = 1). Concurrent validity was assessed by examining correlations between the CORE-10 and comparable measures, and clinical utility was assessed using the criteria of Burton and Tyson (2015). The internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) for the CORE-10 was .80, and test–retest reliability interclass correlation coefficient was .81. Total score correlations between the CORE-10 and concurrent measures ranged from r = .49 to r = .89. The CORE-10 achieved the maximum score (i.e. 6/6) on criteria for clinical utility. Calculations demonstrated a reliable change index of nine points and a clinically significant change cut point of 12 on the CORE-10. Percentiles for CORE-10 total scores are reported. Conclusions This study provides preliminary support for the CORE-10 as a valid and reliable measure that has clinical utility for screening distress in inpatients with stroke.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference38 articles.

1. The Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National Clinical Guidance for Stroke for the United Kingdom and Ireland [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Aug 24]. Available from: https://www.strokeguideline.org/

2. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Stroke in adults (quality standard QS2). [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2023 Aug 24]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs2

3. Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme. FAQs [Internet]. [cited 2023 Aug 24]. Available from: https://ssnap.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360015547133-FAQs

4. Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme. SSNAP dataset for non-acute strokes. [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Aug 24]. Available from: https://ssnap.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/article_attachments/4403186354705

5. The CORE-10: A short measure of psychological distress for routine use in the psychological therapies

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3