Visual attention in change blindness for objects and shadows

Author:

Hermens Frouke1ORCID,Zdravković Sunčica23

Affiliation:

1. Department of Computer Science, Open University of the Netherlands, the Netherlands

2. Laboratory for Experimental Psychology, Psychology Department, University of Novi Sad, Serbia;

3. Laboratory for Experimental Psychology, University of Belgrade, Serbia

Abstract

Studies have found that observers pay less attention to cast shadows in images than to better illuminated regions. In line with such observations, a recent study has suggested stronger change blindness for shadows than for objects (Ehinger et al., 2016). We here examine the role of (overt) visual attention in these findings by recording participants’ eye movements. Participants first viewed all original images (without changes). They then performed a change detection task on a subset of the images with changes in objects or shadows. During both tasks, their eye movements were recorded. In line with the original study, objects (subject to change in the change detection task) were fixated more often than shadows. In contrast to the previous study, better change detection was found for shadows than for objects. The improved change detection for shadows may be explained by the balancing of trials with object and shadow changes in the present study. Eye movements during change detection indicated that participants searched the bottom half of the images. Shadows were more often present in this region, which may explain why they were easier to find.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Sensory Systems,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,Ophthalmology

Reference38 articles.

1. Boyer T. W., Smith T. G., Yu C., Bertenthal B. I. (2011). Visual attention and change detection. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, volume 33.

2. Gaze Patterns and Visual Salience in Change Detection of Natural Scenes

3. Braun J. (1993). Shape-from-shading is independent of visual attention and may be a “texton.”. Spatial vision.

4. Power Analysis and Effect Size in Mixed Effects Models: A Tutorial

5. Buswell G. T. (1935). How people look at pictures: A study of the psychology and perception in art.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3