Working Out What Works: The Case of the Education Endowment Foundation in England

Author:

Edovald Triin1,Nevill Camilla1

Affiliation:

1. The Education Endowment Foundation

Abstract

Purpose: This article gives an overview of the successes and lessons learned to date of the Education Endowment Foundation (EEF), one of the leading organizations of the What Works movement. Design/Approach/Methods: Starting with its history, this article covers salient components of the EEF’s unique journey including lessons learned and challenges in evidence generation. Findings: The EEF has demonstrated that it is feasible to rapidly expand the use of school-based randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in a country context, set high standards for research independence, transparency, and design, and generate new evidence on what works. Challenges include the need to consider alternative designs to RCTs to answer a range of practice-relevant questions, how to best test interventions at scale, and how study findings are reported and interpreted. Originality/Value: This article addresses some of the key components required for the success of What Works organizations globally.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Education

Reference76 articles.

1. Allen R., Jerrim J., Parameshwaran M., Thompson D. (2018). Properties of commercial tests in the EEF database (EEF Research Paper No. 001). https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Support/EEF_Research_Papers/Research_Paper_1_-_Properties_of_commercial_tests.pdf

2. Amrhein V., Greenland S., McShane B. (2019). Comment: Retire statistical significance. Nature, 305, 567. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00857-9

3. Anders J., Brown C., Ehren M., Greany T., Nelson R. (2017). Evaluation of complex whole-school interventions: Methodological and practical considerations. The Education Endowment Foundation. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Grantee_guide_and_EEF_policies/Evaluation/Setting_up_an_Evaluation/EEF_CWSI_RESOURCE_FINAL_25.10.17.pdf

4. Realist randomised controlled trials: A new approach to evaluating complex public health interventions

Cited by 24 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3