Affiliation:
1. The Education Endowment Foundation
Abstract
Purpose: This article gives an overview of the successes and lessons learned to date of the Education Endowment Foundation (EEF), one of the leading organizations of the What Works movement. Design/Approach/Methods: Starting with its history, this article covers salient components of the EEF’s unique journey including lessons learned and challenges in evidence generation. Findings: The EEF has demonstrated that it is feasible to rapidly expand the use of school-based randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in a country context, set high standards for research independence, transparency, and design, and generate new evidence on what works. Challenges include the need to consider alternative designs to RCTs to answer a range of practice-relevant questions, how to best test interventions at scale, and how study findings are reported and interpreted. Originality/Value: This article addresses some of the key components required for the success of What Works organizations globally.
Reference76 articles.
1. Allen R., Jerrim J., Parameshwaran M., Thompson D. (2018). Properties of commercial tests in the EEF database (EEF Research Paper No. 001). https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Support/EEF_Research_Papers/Research_Paper_1_-_Properties_of_commercial_tests.pdf
2. Amrhein V., Greenland S., McShane B. (2019). Comment: Retire statistical significance. Nature, 305, 567. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00857-9
3. Anders J., Brown C., Ehren M., Greany T., Nelson R. (2017). Evaluation of complex whole-school interventions: Methodological and practical considerations. The Education Endowment Foundation. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Grantee_guide_and_EEF_policies/Evaluation/Setting_up_an_Evaluation/EEF_CWSI_RESOURCE_FINAL_25.10.17.pdf
4. Realist randomised controlled trials: A new approach to evaluating complex public health interventions
Cited by
24 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献