Impact of transiting from fluorescent polarisation immunoassay to high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry for immunosuppressant levels analysis in kidney transplant patients

Author:

Goh Li Fang1ORCID,Khoo Sher Ri1,Tung Yu-Tzu1,Lee Puay Hoon1,Kee Terence2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore

2. Department of Renal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore

Abstract

Background: High-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-TMS) is preferred to fluorescent polarisation immunoassay (FPIA) in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), as it only measures active drug. Our hospital replaced FPIA with HPLC-TMS for analysis of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) levels. Preliminary studies demonstrated significantly lower CNI levels with HPLC-TMS versus FPIA in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Most studies evaluating CNI exposure in KTRs used FPIA, posing challenges in interpreting HPLC-TMS levels. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety outcomes in the one-year period before (FPIA period) and after (HPLC-TMS period) the switch. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on KTRs receiving ciclosporin (CsA) or tacrolimus (FK). Primary effectiveness end points were biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) rate and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR); safety end points were viral infections and hospitalisation for infection. The secondary end point was change in CNI levels during the FPIA versus HPLC-TMS periods. Results: A total of 307 patients were analysed (CsA n=182, FK n=125). BPAR only occurred in two patients in the HPLC-TMS period among the CsA cohort ( p=0.50), but it occurred in six patients in the FPIA period and one patient in the HPLC-TMS period ( p=0.13) among the FK cohort. Median eGFR were similar in both periods (CsA: 52.2 mL/min/1.73 m2 (interquartile range (IQR) 39.8–67.6) vs. 52.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 (IQR 37.1–68.0), p=0.65; FK: 57.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 (IQR 39.1–80.0) vs. 56.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 (IQR 33.5–76.7), p=0.08). There were no significant differences in safety outcomes. The median change in CNI levels from the FPIA period to the HPLC-TMS period was –20.5% (IQR –32.5 to –3.9) and –6.9% (IQR –17.7 to 8.0) among CsA and FK cohorts, respectively ( p<0.01). Conclusion: The switch from FPIA to HPLC-TMS for CNI TDM in KTRs did not yield significant changes in clinical end points.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3