Validation of short instruments assessing parental and caregivers’ perceptions on child health and development for personalized prevention

Author:

Doove Bernice12ORCID,Feron Jolien3,Feron Frans24,van Os Jim567,Drukker Marjan5

Affiliation:

1. Well-Child Care Centre, Preventive Child Health Care Division, Envida, The Netherlands

2. Department of Social Medicine, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, The Netherlands

3. Mental Healthcare, MET ggz, The Netherlands

4. Youth Health Care Division, Regional Public Health Service South Limburg, The Netherlands

5. Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, MHeNS School for Mental Health and NeuroScience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, The Netherlands

6. King’s Health Partners and Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, UK

7. Department of Psychiatry, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands

Abstract

Systematically exploring parental as well as other caregivers’ concerns is a main component in preventive child health care (PCHC) for family-centred practice and personalized health care. To facilitate communication and early identification of emerging mental health problems, a PCHC toolkit based on short instruments was developed. This article investigates the reliability and validity of (1) two visual analogue scales (VAS) to assess parent-reported ‘parenting’ and ‘child behaviour’, (2) a professional caregiver-reported VAS to assess ‘child competence’ and (3) the parents’ evaluation of developmental status (PEDS) in Dutch PCHC. Parents as well as child care, kindergarten and preschool teachers completed instruments in a community-based sample of children ( N = 346) aged 3 years at baseline. The three VAS and PEDS were associated with standardized questionnaires assessing the same constructs. Overall predictive accuracy showed: good to excellent for ‘parenting’ VAS, fair to good for ‘child behaviour’ VAS and poor for ‘child competence’ VAS. The PEDS, ‘parenting’ VAS and ‘child behaviour’ VAS, demonstrated high sensitivity at various cut-off points of index test and reference standard. At follow-up, approximately 1 year later, results were similar. Although the ‘child competence’ VAS scored lower on one aspect of validity, the PEDS and the different VAS are reliable, valid and useful as brief monitoring tools in daily Dutch PCHC practice.

Funder

ZonMw

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3