Affiliation:
1. George Peabody College for Teachers
Abstract
A survey was made of the literature on juvenile delinquency preven tion efforts over the past ten years. From approximately 6,600 abstracts, only 96 reports were found which contained some form of empirical data of project effects. Each report was rated for internal and external validity and for policy utility. Overall, the literature was low in both scientific validity and policy utility. The findings are discussed in relation to three general categories of problems—political, methodological, and theoreti cal. Political pressure may force outcome evaluation when process evaluation would be more appropriate. Methodological problems arise from unclear and varying definitions of prevention, delinquency, and treatment. Simplistic and nonexistent theoretical perspectives lead to unrealistic expectations for success.
Reference141 articles.
1. Correctional Outcome: An Evaluation of 100 Reports
2. Beck, B.M. & Beck, D.B. Does recreation prevent delinquency? In J. R. Stratton & R. M. Terry (Eds.), Prevention of delinquency: Problems and programs. New York: Macmillan, 1968. Pp. 271-273.
3. The Value and Validity of Delinquency Prevention Experiments
Cited by
80 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Prevention Research in Schools;Criminology & Public Policy;2017-02
2. Interventions for Juvenile Offenders: A Serendipitous Journey;Criminology & Public Policy;2014-02
3. Juvenile Transfer in the United States;Reforming Juvenile Justice;2009
4. Trends in Youth Offending in Europe;Reforming Juvenile Justice;2009
5. Präventionskonzepte;Auf der Suche nach neuer Sicherheit;2009