Does the Musk Twitter Takeover Matter? Political Influencers, Their Arguments, and the Quality of Information They Share

Author:

Rohlinger Deana A.1ORCID,Rose Kyle1,Warren Sarah2ORCID,Shulman Stuart3

Affiliation:

1. Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA

2. Rochester University, Rochester, NY, USA

3. Texifter, Amherst, USA

Abstract

In October 2022, Elon Musk took over Twitter. Although conservatives cheered the takeover, progressives decried it as dangerous for democracy. Despite scholarly interest in Twitter, little is known about the impact of “old” Twitter’s policies on the information environment, making it difficult to speculate about Musk’s effects. The authors begin to address this gap through an analysis of 245,020 tweets collected before and after Twitter suspended eight accounts calling for state audits of the 2020 presidential election results. In this analysis of message amplifiers, or accounts receiving 200 or more retweets, and message drivers, or top-ranked accounts, no evidence is found that the Twitter ban improved the ideas or the quality of information shared about the election, nor did it dramatically change who posted about the audit. The authors conclude with a discussion of the implications of these findings for future research on Twitter under Musk’s control.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Social Sciences

Reference44 articles.

1. Ad Fontes Media. 2022. “Interactive Media Bias Chart.” Retrieved September 12, 2022. https://adfontesmedia.com/interactive-media-bias-chart/.

2. Trends in the diffusion of misinformation on social media

3. Aslam Salman. 2022. “Twitter by the Numbers: Stats, Demographics & Fun Facts.” Omnicore Agency. Retrieved December 14, 2022. https://www.omnicoreagency.com/twitter-statistics/.

4. Trend of Narratives in the Age of Misinformation

5. Who Is Retweeted in Times of Political Protest? An Analysis of Characteristics of Top Tweeters and Top Retweeted Users During the 2011 Egyptian Revolution

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3