Abstract
It is useful to look at the distinction between transitory and permanent effects of a crisis. Financial crises normally bring on a recession, and the output costs can be large, as Hoggarth and Saporta (2001) discuss. In the majority of cases since 1970 in the OECD countries output returns to its trend level and there is no permanent effect. However, there may have been a permanent scar on the level of output in Japan after its crisis in the early 1990s, making the crisis and subsequent recession much more costly. This may reflect the nature and length of the crisis, as the banking sector was left to flounder for some years before its rescue toward the end of the crisis period. This appears to have left a permanent scar because risk premia were subsequently higher, and real asset prices have not fully recovered.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference7 articles.
1. Commentary: Growth Prospects and Financial Services
2. Foreign Direct Investment, Technological Change, and Economic Growth within Europe
3. FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY
4. Barrell, R. , Gottschalk, S. , Kirby, S. and Orazgani, A. (2009), ‘Projections of migration inflows under alternative scenarios for the World Economy’, Department of Communities and Local Government Economics Paper No. 3.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献