Constant Observation Practices for Hospitalized Persons With Dementia: A Survey Study

Author:

Sinvani Liron123ORCID,Strunk Andrew4,Patel Vidhi23,Shah Shalin13,Mulvany Colm2ORCID,Kozikowski Andrzej23,Boltz Marie5,Pekmezaris Renee23,Wolf-Klein Gisele6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA

2. Center of Health Innovation and Outcomes Research (CHIOR), The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA

3. Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA

4. Department of Dermatology, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA

5. College of Nursing, Penn State, University Park, PA, USA

6. Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA

Abstract

Despite substantial staffing and cost implications, the use of constant observation (CO) has been poorly described in the acute care setting. The purpose of this cross-sectional, multicenter, survey study was to assess hospital provider practices regarding the use of CO. Of the 543 surveys distributed, 231 were completed across 5 sites. Most respondents worked on medical units (67.5%), as nurses (49.1%); 44.8% were white; and 75.6% were female. The majority (84.2%) reported at least 1 patient/wk requiring CO. Most frequent indication for CO was dementia with agitation (60.7%), in patients older than 70 (62.3%) and predominantly by nurse assistants (93.9%). Almost half (47.3%) stated they felt pressured to discontinue CO, despite a strong perceived benefit (76%). Enhanced observation (92.6%) was most frequently used to decrease CO. Finally, 77.9% perceived that those performing CO lacked training. Our study highlights the widespread use of CO for hospitalized older adults with dementia.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Geriatrics and Gerontology,Clinical Psychology,General Neuroscience

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3