Historical Perspectives on the Evolution of Spino-Pelvic Fixation and its Implications on Clinical Care A Narrative Review

Author:

von Glinski Alexander1234ORCID,Yilmaz Emre123ORCID,Godolias Periklis123ORCID,Benneker Lorin5,Oner F. C.6,Kandziora Frank7,Schroeder Gregory8,Schnake Klaus9,Dvorak Marcel10,Rajasekaran Shanmuganathan11ORCID,El-Sharkawi Mohammad12ORCID,Vaccaro Alexander13,Bransford Richard14ORCID,Schildhauer Thomas A.3,Chapman Jens R.1215

Affiliation:

1. Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Swedish Medical Center - Cherry Hill Campus, Seattle, WA, USA

2. Seattle Science Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA

3. Department of General and Trauma Surgery, Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany

4. Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Katholisches Klinikum Bochum - St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, German

5. Spine Surgery, Sonnenhof Clinic Orthopaedic Department, Bern, Switzerland

6. Department of Orthopaedics, Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

7. Center for Spinal Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany

8. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute and Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA

9. Center for Spine and Scoliosis Surgery, Malteser Waldkrankenhaus St Marien gGmbH, Erlangen, Germany

10. Department of Orthopaedics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

11. Spine Surgery, Ganga Medical Centre and Hospitals Pvt Ltd, Coimbatore, India

12. Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt

13. Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA

14. Department of Orthopaedics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

15. Complex Spine Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, USA

Abstract

Study Design Broad narrative review. Objectives To review and summarize the evolution of spinopelvic fixation (SPF) and its implications on clinical care. Methods A thorough review of peer-reviewed literature was performed on the historical evolution of sacropelvic fixation techniques and their respective advantages and disadvantages. Results The sacropelvic junction has been a long-standing challenge due to a combination of anatomic idiosyncrasies and very high biomechanical forces. While first approaches of fusion were determinated by many material and surgical technique-related limitations, the modern idea of stabilization of the lumbosacral junction was largely initiated by the inclusion of the ilium into lumbosacral fusion. While there is a wide spectrum of indications for SPF the chosen technique remains is defined by the individual pathology and surgeons’ preference. Conclusion By a constant evolution of both instrumentation hardware and surgical technique better fusion rates paired with improved clinical results could be achieved.

Funder

AO Spine

AO Network Clinical Research

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3