Affiliation:
1. Providence Little Company of Mary, San Pedro and Torrance, CA, USA
2. Neiswanger Institute for Bioethics & Healthcare Leadership, Loyola University, Chicago, IL, USA
Abstract
Dying in the United States is characterized as: medicalized, depersonalized, high technology, fragmented with frequent transitions among care settings, burdensome to patients and families, driven by efficiency and effectiveness, and lacking in key areas, for example, access to palliative care and adequate pain and symptom treatment. Patients and families are often left with a choice of two extremes: vitalism or utilitarian pessimism (utilitarianism). The Catholic Church, however, rejects both of these extremes, and Catholic social teaching (CST) at end of life focuses on ordinary-extraordinary treatments/means, a culture of life and human dignity, accompaniment and community, and caring for whole persons through the end of life. The Catholic tradition of ordinary-extraordinary means is helpful to guide complex end-of-life decisions, regardless of one's religious beliefs, and offers a middle ground between vitalism and utilitarianism that can inform end-of-life care and decision-making for all patients in Catholic health care. While it does not provide answers, it offers guidance and enables conversations that are crucial for the dying and their families to make autonomous, informed decisions about end-of-life care. It provides an opportunity for the dying to let the care team, loved ones, and decision-makers know what a life with meaning, purpose, and passion is for them—and how they want to live and die. This article will summarize the problem, describe end-of-life Catholic teaching, and discuss how it offers a middle-ground. Arguments for and against vitalism and utilitarianism will be explored, including a discussion of CST's response to those receiving care in Catholic health care facilities who are outside the Catholic tradition and do not believe in the teaching. The last section describes a model of collaborative partnership where local parishes and Catholic health care come together to tackle the challenges of caring for and ministering to the seriously ill and those facing death.
Reference86 articles.
1. Epidemiology And Patterns Of Care At The End Of Life: Rising Complexity, Shifts In Care Patterns And Sites Of Death
2. Avellino Rose, Barnett Katy, Goldberg Lee. 2017. How Faith Communities Facilitate Conversations Around End-of-Life Concerns. Issue Brief, Washington, DC: The Pew Charitable Trusts, 1–32. Accessed November 15, 2020. https://www.pewtrusts.org/∼/media/assets/2017/09/eol_how_faith_communities_facilitate_conversations_around_end_of_life_concerns.pdf.
3. Responding to Requests for Physician-Assisted Suicide
4. The Anticipatory Corpse