Delivering Genetic Testing for Patients with Prostate Cancer: Moving Beyond Provider Knowledge as a Barrier to Care

Author:

Gunn Christine M.123ORCID,Li Emma X.4,Gignac Gretchen A.45,Pankowska Magdalena2,Loo Stephanie3,Zayhowski Kimberly5,Wang Catharine6

Affiliation:

1. Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice and Dartmouth Cancer Center, Lebanon, NH, USA

2. Evans Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University Aram V. Chobanian & Edward Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA

3. Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

4. Evans Department of Medicine, Boston University Aram V. Chobanian & Edward Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA

5. Evans Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology and Oncology, Boston University Aram V. Chobanian & Edward Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA

6. Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

Abstract

Introduction The 2018 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for prostate cancer genetic testing expanded access to genetic services. Few studies have examined how this change has affected provider practice outside of large cancer centers. Methods We conducted a qualitative study of multi-disciplinary health care providers treating patients with prostate cancer at a safety-net hospital. Participants completed an interview that addressed knowledge, practices, and contextual factors related to providing genetic services to patients with prostate cancer. A thematic analysis using both inductive and deductive coding was undertaken. Results Seventeen providers completed interviews. Challenges in identifying eligible patients for genetic testing stemmed from a lack of a) systems that facilitate routine patient identification, and b) readily available family history data for eligibility determination. Providers identified non-medical patient characteristics that influenced their referral process, including health literacy, language, cultural beliefs, patient distress, and cost. Providers who see patients at different times along the cancer care continuum viewed benefits of testing differently. Conclusion The use of digital technologies that systematically identify those eligible for genetic testing referrals may mitigate some but not all challenges identified in this study. Further research should determine how individual provider perceptions influence referral practices and patient access to genetics both within and across cancer specialties.

Funder

U.S. Army

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Oncology,Hematology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3