Comparison of Arthroscopic-Assisted Percutaneous Internal Fixation With a Modified Reducer Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Schatzker Type II and III Tibial Plateau Fractures

Author:

Huang Xingrui12,Zhao Song3,Jiang Yuanbin2,Fang Shuchen2,Xu Hao2,Li Hanlin2,Zhao Jinzhong3,Dong Qirong1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

2. Department of Orthopedics, Suzhou Wujiang District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Suzhou Wujiang District Second People’s Hospital), Suzhou, China.

3. Department of Sports Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai, China.

Abstract

Background: Tibial plateau fractures require anatomical reduction and stable fixation to achieve satisfactory results. In addition, addressing any related injuries is of paramount importance. Arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation (ARIF) has been promoted as a possible technique to treat tibial plateau fractures. Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of ARIF with this modified reducer and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for Schatzker types II and III tibial plateau fractures. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 68 patients who were treated for Schatzker type II or III tibial plateau fractures between August 1, 2014, and October 31, 2018. Patients were categorized into the ARIF (n = 33) and ORIF groups (n = 35). The groups were compared regarding intra-articular injuries, duration of hospital stay, complications, and clinical outcomes—including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, and range of motion (ROM). The paired t test was used to compare preoperative and postoperative data, and the chi-square test was used to compare the IKDC and HSS scores. Results: The median follow-up period was 36 months (26-40 months). Additional intra-articular lesions were found in 29 patients—21 in the ARIF group and 8 in the ORIF group ( P = .02). A significant difference was observed in the duration of hospital stay—3.58 ± 1.46 days for the ARIF group and 4.57 ± 1.12 days for the ORIF group ( t = –3.169; P = .002). All fractures healed within 3 months after surgery. The complication rate for all patients was 11%, with no significant difference between the ARIF and ORIF groups ( t = 1.244; P = .265). At the final follow-up, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the IKDC score, HSS score, and ROM ( P > .05 for all). Conclusion: ARIF with a modified reducer was found to be an effective, reliable, and safe procedure for the treatment of Schatzker types II and III tibial plateau fractures. Both ARIF and ORIF provided equally good results, while ARIF offered a more precise evaluation and reduced the duration of hospital stay.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3