Abstract
With the wide adoption by many states of objective prison classification systems, there has been an associated expectation among prison officials that these new systems would foster improved prison operations and reductions in prison violence. However, this has not always been the case. Failure to realize these expectations can be more accurately traced to improperly designed or implemented classification systems rather than the validity of these systems as originally designed. This article applies the lessons of one state (California) to propose a methodology for evaluating how well designed a particular model is and if implementation is occurring as intended. Referred to as “process evaluation,” this approach is intended to assist prison officials to “fine tune” their classification systems and establish a method for accurately monitoring the most critical aspects of prison operations.
Subject
Law,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献