Education researchers’ perceptions of and experiences with the research ethics application process in Europe and beyond

Author:

Raykov Milosh1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Malta, Malta

Abstract

Research ethics reviews are an integral component of the research process in education, but little is known about educators’ perceptions of and experiences with this process. This exploratory study examines educators’ perceptions of and experiences with the reviews of research ethics and, in this way, it contributes to a better understanding of this significant but often challenging research component. The study is based on the integration of quantitative findings from an online survey and the thematic analysis of open-ended responses. The research findings have revealed a distinct pattern of the participants’ responses related to the issues in the ethics review process concerning purpose, ambiguity, and process-related matters. The study also found that a significant number of educators face difficulties during the preparation of their applications. Analysis of the open-ended responses has provided some insights that enhance the findings of the survey by contributing to a deeper understanding of the researchers’ experience with and attitudes toward research ethics. The results of this study indicate the complexity of the research process and the need for comprehensive preparation and an efficient support system that will facilitate rather than hinder the quality and efficiency of research in education.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Education

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3