Environmental philosophy in Asia: Between eco-orientalism and ecological nationalisms

Author:

Droz Laÿna1ORCID,Fricke Martin F2,Heroor Nakul3,Jannel Romaric4ORCID,Komatsubara Orika5ORCID,Lagasca-Hiloma Concordia Marie A6,Matangcas Paul Mart Jeyand J7ORCID,Sihombing Hesron H8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo City, Tokyo, Japan

2. Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores, Unidad Mérida, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico

3. Rachel Carson Center for Environment and Society, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munchen, Bayern, Germany

4. Institute for Research in Humanities, Kyoto University, and Collège international de philosophie, Kyoto, Japan

5. Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan

6. School of Arts and Sciences, Isabela State University-Cauayan, Cauayan City, Isabela, Philippines

7. Faculty of Information and Communication Studies, University of the Philippines Open University, Laguna, Calabarzon, Philippines

8. University of Denver/Iliff School of Theology, Denver, Colorado, USA

Abstract

Environmental philosophy – broadly conceived as using philosophical tools to develop ideas related to environmental issues – is conducted and practised in highly diverse ways in different contexts and traditions in Asia. ‘Asian environmental philosophy’ can be understood to include Asian traditions of thought as well as grassroots perspectives on environmental issues in Asia. Environmental issues have sensitive political facets tied to who has the legitimacy to decide about how natural resources are used. Because of this, the works, practices, and researchers in Asian environmental philosophy are exposed to being (mis)used by diverse stakeholders and actors to support political ends not related to environmental sustainability. Two processes are at play at the nexus of the construction of identities in relation to conceptualisations of nature: eco-orientalism and ecological nationalisms. This paper analyzes and exemplifies these dynamics through a conceptual framework that distinguishes ideological and socio-technical explanations of environmental degradation. Finally, to minimise the risks of political misuse, five pathways are presented to carefully help curate environmental, philosophical statements: contextualise, quantify uncertainty and ‘uniqueness’, downscale, confront claims with local realities and literature, and collaborate with researchers from other disciplines. Conjointly, these pathways aim at favouring intercultural collaboration while valuing diversity, thus supporting the development and exchanges in environmental philosophy in Asia and beyond.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3