Content Validation of Clinician-Reported Items for a Severity Measure for CDKL5 Deficiency Disorder

Author:

Saldaris Jacinta1,Weisenberg Judith2,Pestana-Knight Elia3,Marsh Eric D.4,Suter Bernhard5,Rajaraman Rajsekar6,Heidary Gena7,Olson Heather E.8,Devinsky Orrin9,Price Dana9,Jacoby Peter1,Leonard Helen110,Benke Tim A.11,Demarest Scott11,Downs Jenny112ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

2. St Louis Children’s Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA

3. Cleveland Clinic, Neurological Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA

4. Division of Neurology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

5. Texas Children’s Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA

6. UCLA Mattel Children’s Hospital, Los Angeles, CA, USA

7. Department of Ophthalmology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

8. Department of Neurology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

9. NYU Langone Health and Department of Neurology, New York University, NY, USA

10. The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

11. Children’s Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA

12. Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Abstract

CDKL5 deficiency disorder (CDD) results in early-onset seizures and severe developmental impairments. A CDD clinical severity assessment (CCSA) was previously developed with clinician and parent-report items to capture information on a range of domains. Consistent with US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines, content validation is the first step in evaluating the psychometric properties of an outcome measure. The aim of this study was to validate the content of the clinician-reported items in the CCSA (CCSA-Clinician). Eight neurologists leading the USA CDD Center of Excellence clinics were interviewed using the “think aloud” technique to critique 26 clinician-reported items. Common themes were aggregated, and a literature search of related assessments informed item modifications. The clinicians then participated in 2 consensus meetings to review themes and finalize the items. A consensus was achieved for the content of the CCSA-Clinician. Eight of the original items were omitted, 11 items were added, and the remaining 18 items were revised. The final 29 items were classified into 2 domains: functioning and neurologic impairments. This study enabled refinement of the CCSA-Clinician and provided evidence for its content validity. This preliminary validation is essential before field testing and further validation, in order to advance the instrument toward clinical trial readiness.

Funder

NIH

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Clinical Neurology,Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3