Exploratory study on end-of-life issues: Barriers to palliative care and advance directives

Author:

Feeg Veronica D.1,Elebiary Hoda1

Affiliation:

1. College of Nursing and Health Science, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia

Abstract

Background. In the United States, as in most developed countries, death is rarely unexpected. It usually occurs in older persons with chronic progressive illnesses that often are complicated by infections or exacerbations. Many patients with terminal illnesses choose palliative care to relieve symptoms, improve the quality of their lives, and strive for a peaceful death. Professionals who serve dying patients need to recognize the importance of advance directives as part of a patient’s decision to forgo curative treatment for palliative care. Objectives. SOLACE™ (Supporters of Life-Affirming Care at End of Life) is a coalition of interdisciplinary professionals in the northern Virginia community dedicated to improving end-of-life care. The objectives of the SOLACE survey were to identify and describe: 1) professionals’ perceptions about barriers related to hospice and palliative care, 2) professionals’ opinions about barriers related to dying at home, 3) professionals’ perceptions about barriers related to advance directives, and 4) relationships between professionals and their perceived barriers to advance directives and hospice and palliative care. Methods. From several consultations with hospice experts, a survey questionnaire was developed to solicit responses from professionals on palliative care, dying at home, and advance directives. Measures that assessed obstacles to palliative care were modified from previous studies to yield composite barrier scores. From a sample of a variety of participants at a national conference on palliative care (n = 200), 101 subjects returned questionnaires (51 percent) yielding 100 usable completed forms from attendees who demonstrated an interest in palliative care and, in some cases, a high level of personal or professional experience. Survey results were analyzed on respondents’ perceptions concerning barriers related to advance directives and the delivery of palliative care. Results. Of the 13 obstacle statements, results show that respondents rated the top three barriers as 1) physician reluctance to make referrals (mean = 4.23), 2) physician lack of familiarity with availability and suitability of hospice (mean = 3.93), and 3) association of hospice with death (mean = 3.93). There was a statistically significant difference in scores for respondents from hospitals and respondents from hospices on their assessment of barriers for the association of hospice with death (t = -2.09, p < .05) and the lack of information about the severity of or irreversibility of the patient’s illness (t = -2.78, p < .01).

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Reference7 articles.

Cited by 60 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Introducing palliative care in advanced cancer: a systematic review;BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care;2024-02-02

2. Challenges in establishing optimal pediatric palliative care at the university hospital in Slovenia;European Journal of Pediatrics;2023-01-21

3. Palliative care in neurology patients;International Anesthesiology Clinics;2023

4. Advance Care Planning;Evidence‐Based Nephrology;2022-11-18

5. Home-Based Palliative Care Team Perspectives on Challenges in Patient Referral and Enrollment;Journal of Pain and Symptom Management;2022-05

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3