Family caregiver satisfaction with care at end of life: Report from the cultural variations study (CVAS)

Author:

Phipps Etienne J.1,Braitman Leonard E.2

Affiliation:

1. Albert Einstein Healthcare Network, Einstein Center for Urban Health Policy and Research; Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

2. Albert Einstein Health-care Network, Office of Research and Technology Development, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine differences in family caregiver satisfaction with care at end of life based on site of death, in an observational study involving advanced cancer patients and their family caregivers. The study was based on follow-up interviews with 28 family caregivers of 28 patients who died during a two-year prospective study involving 68 patients and 68 family caregivers. Telephone interviews addressed the circumstances of the patients’ death, their satisfaction with the care provided to the patient, and their satisfaction with how well they were attended to by health providers. There were no associations between site of death (died at home vs. did not die at home) and family caregiver satisfaction with the overall care provided to the patient. However, family caregivers of patients who died at home responded that they thought the patient was more at peace (with respect to spiritual and religious matters) than did family care-givers of patients who did not die at home (p = 0.003). Family caregivers of patients who died at home appeared to feel less satisfied with the attention paid to their own wishes regarding the patient’s care (p = 0.13), less satisfied with the emotional support provided to them by healthcare personnel taking care of the patient (p = 0.08), and less satisfied with communication from health providers (p = 0.11). Findings indicate that although dying at home appears to provide a more peaceful death for the patient, it may also distance family care-givers from health professionals and leave them feeling less supported during the patient’s last days of life.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3