Endovascular Approaches to Complex Thoracic Aortic Disease

Author:

Hughes G. Chad1,Sulzer Christopher F.2,McCann Richard L.3,Swaminathan Madhav4

Affiliation:

1. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina,

2. Service d'Anesthesiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland

3. Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

4. Division of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Abstract

Diseases of the thoracic aorta remain among the most lethal and difficult to treat conditions. In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration approved the first endoprosthesis for the treatment of aneurysms of the descending thoracic aorta; at present, there are 3 thoracic devices approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. Although approved only for the treatment of descending aneurysms, thoracic endografting has other potential off-label applications, including acute and chronic aortic dissection and traumatic aortic transection. Endovascular repair of thoracic aortic pathology is emerging as the preferred treatment strategy in certain patients, as increasing data suggest that endovascular repair may be performed with lower peri-operative morbidity and mortality rates and similar midterm survival, when compared with standard open repair. However, because of anatomic constraints related to required endograft seal zones, a significant number of patients are excluded from standard endovascular repair. Hybrid techniques, including open aortic arch and thoracoabdominal debranching procedures, have been described to allow creation of proximal and/or distal landing zones for the stent graft seal. This review describes the surgical and anesthetic considerations relevant to thoracic endografting, with an emphasis on hybrid procedures used to treat more complex thoracic aortic pathology. Hybrid techniques may be performed with lower rates of morbidity and mortality than conventional open repair, and they appear to be a safe alternative to open repair for thoracoabdominal and aortic arch aneurysms in properly selected patients with significant comorbidity or prior open aortic surgery.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 26 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3