Evaluation of Circulating Calcitonin: Analytical Aspects

Abstract

Background and aim Calcitonin (hCT) is a useful serum marker for the diagnosis and monitoring of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). However, hCT values provided by different methods may differ, leading to difficulties in the interpretation of hCT results. In this study we compared four immunoradiometric (IRMA) and radioimmunometric (RIA) assays for hCT determination. Material and methods hCT was measured in 35 patients by means of the following commercially available IRMA or RIA kits: CT US (Biosource), IRMA hCT (Schering-CIS bio international), ultra-sensitive calcitonin (DSL), and calcitonin assay (Scantibodies). A comparison of the distribution of the hCT values measured by the tested IRMA-RIAs and a correlation analysis were performed. Results The hCT values were widely dispersed and the classification of the patients according to the hCT cutoff value varied depending on the assay used. Conclusion Despite efforts to develop new, highly specific antibodies, the evaluation of this marker is still flawed by analytical inaccuracy. hCT values are widely dispersed depending on the method used for marker measurement; as a consequence, patient classification according to the hCT cutoff value is still dependent on the assay used.