Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee Points to Consider: Biological Sample Retention From Nonclinical Toxicity Studies

Author:

Harbison Carole E.1ORCID,Aulbach Adam D.2,Bennet Bindu M.3ORCID,Boyle Molly H.4,Carsillo Mary E.1,Crabbs Torrie A.5,Keirstead Natalie D.6,La Perle Krista M. D.7,Pandiri Arun R.8,Shoieb Ahmed M.9,Siska William D.10

Affiliation:

1. Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA

2. Inotiv, Maryland Heights, MO, USA

3. Relay Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA, USA

4. Covance Laboratories, Somerset, NJ, USA

5. Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA

6. Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA

7. Comparative Pathology & Digital Imaging Shared Resource, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

8. Cellular and Molecular Pathology Branch, Division of National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA

9. Drug Safety R&D, Pfizer Worldwide RD&M, Groton, CT, USA

10. Charles River Laboratories Inc., Reno, NV, USA

Abstract

Samples of biologic specimens and their derivatives (eg, wet tissues, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks, histology slides, frozen tissues, whole blood, serum/plasma, and urine) are routinely collected during the course of nonclinical toxicity studies. Good Laboratory Practice regulations and/or guidance specify minimum requirements for specimen retention duration, with the caveat that retention of biologic specimens need not extend beyond the duration of sample stability. However, limited availability of published data regarding stability for various purposes following storage of each specimen type has resulted in confusion, uncertainty, and inconsistency as to the appropriate duration for storage of these specimens. To address these issues, a working group of the Society of Toxicologic Pathology Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee was formed to review published information, regulations, and guidance pertinent to this topic and to summarize the current practices and rationales for retention duration through a survey-based approach. Information regarding experiences reaccessing biologic specimens and performing sample stability investigations was also collected. Based on this combined information, the working group developed several points to consider that may be referenced when developing or revising sample retention practices. [Box: see text]

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cell Biology,Toxicology,Molecular Biology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3