Choosing not to help: The ethical challenge of beneficence for clinicians conducting ethnographic research

Author:

Brookfield Samuel1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Australia

Abstract

For clinicians conducting ethnographic research, conflict can arise between the clinical understanding of beneficence, meaning to apply skills and knowledge for people towards whom there is a duty of care, and enacting beneficence through research, which can sometimes allow researchers to withhold assistance in the interests of generating data which may have a broader beneficent effect when applied. As a nurse and ethnographic researcher, I present three reflections on my own fieldwork with people engaging in recovery from harmful methamphetamine use, to explore how beneficence can be enacted in constrained and complex circumstances. These reflections provide the basis for a discussion of how relational ethics can reveal the fabric of microethical actions and decisions which comprise clinical and research interactions, allowing practitioners to demonstrate a continuity between how they enact principles like beneficence both in the context of clinical work and in the field.

Funder

Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital Foundation

Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3