Structured Assessment of Mental Health Status in Psychogeriatrics: Validity of the French HoNOS65+

Author:

Canuto Alessandra1,Weber Kerstin2,Gold Gabriel3,Notaridis Grigorios4,Michon Agnès1,Giardini Umberto1,Delaloye Christophe5,Herrmann François6,Giannakopoulos Panteleimon7

Affiliation:

1. Chief Attending, Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

2. Psychologist, Centre of Neurogerontopsychology, Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

3. Associate Professor, Medical Head a.i., Division of Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

4. Resident in Psychiatry, Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

5. Head of the Centre of Neurogerontopsychology, Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

6. Privat-Docent, Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

7. Full Professor, Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

Abstract

Objective: To assess the reliability, validity, and feasibility of a French version of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Elderly People (HoNOS65+). Method: Twenty mental health professionals completed the scale for 126 elderly patients. We assessed interrater reliability in inpatient and outpatient settings, together with construct and discriminant validity, as well as concurrent validity compared with several widely used clinical instruments. Results: Excellent agreement among raters was observed in the outpatient subgroup (kappa range 0.77 to 1.00), whereas interrater reliability was modest in the inpatient subgroup (kappa values < 0.55). In cases where the patient–caregiver relationship lasted more than 1 month, the reliability of the scale improved. Construct validity analysis revealed no subscale structure. All items except “self-injury” displayed high concurrent validity (significant Spearman correlations with 8 other questionnaires). In terms of discriminant validity, the “cognitive impairment” (area under the curve [AUC] 0.91) and “depressive symptoms” (AUC 0.79) items showed high sensitivity and specificity values. Conclusion: Our results indicate that the French version of HoNOS65+ is a promising clinical assessment tool to evaluate mental disorders in the elderly in outpatient settings. We support its use in routine clinical practice, with the condition that a relatively long and individualized patient–caregiver relationship has been established.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3