Author:
Boehmke Frederick J.,Skinner Paul
Abstract
AbstractHow do the American states vary in their propensity for innovativeness, or their willingness to adopt new policies sooner or later relative to other states? Most studies today use event history analysis (EHA) to focus almost exclusively on one policy area at a time at the expense of a broader understanding of innovativeness as a characteristic of states. To return to the concept of innovativeness more broadly, our study revisits and updates the original approach taken by Walker by updating his average innovation scores with new data covering more than 180 different policies. We use these data to construct a new, dynamic measure of innovativeness that addresses biases and shortcomings in the original measure and we provide measures of uncertainty for both. These new scores build on the logic of EHA to address issues such as right-censoring and to facilitate measuring changes in innovativeness over time. We then compare the two measures of innovativeness and evaluate differences across states, spatial patterns, and changes in innovativeness over time.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Reference46 articles.
1. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models
2. Berry, Frances Stokes , and Berry, William D. . 2007. “Innovation and Diffusion Models in Policy Research.” In Theories of the Policy Process, 2nd ed., eds. Paul A. Sabatier. Boulder, CO: Westview, 223–60.
3. Approaches to Modeling the Adoption and Diffusion of Policies with Multiple Components
Cited by
121 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献