Retrospective survey from vascular access team Lombardy net in COVID-19 era

Author:

Gidaro Antonio1ORCID,Vailati Davide2,Gemma Marco3,Lugli Francesca1,Casella Francesco1,Cogliati Chiara1,Canelli Antonio2,Cremonesi Nadia2,Monolo Davide4,Cordio Giuseppe4,Frosi Chiara4,Destefanis Riccardo5,Rossi Anna5,Alemanno Maria Chiara6,Valenza Franco6,Luisoni Mara Dina6ORCID,Elli Stefano7,Caldarini Andrea7,Lucchini Alberto7ORCID,Paglia Stefano8,Baroni Monica8,Giustivi Davide8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences Luigi Sacco, University of Milan, Luigi Sacco Hospital, Milan, Italy

2. Intensive Care Unit ASST Melegnano Martesana, Milan, Italy

3. Intensive Care Unit Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Milan, Italy

4. UOC S.I.T.R.A. ASST OVEST MILANESE, Milan, Italy

5. Foundation Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus, Milan, Italy

6. Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology Fondazione IRCCS—Istituto Nazionale dei Tumor, Milan, Italy

7. Intensive Care Unit ASST Monza, Monza, Italy

8. Emergency Department ASST Lodi, Lodi, Italy

Abstract

Background: Venous Access Devices (VADs) are the most used devices in COVID-19 patients. Objective: Identify VADs implanted, catheter related thrombosis (CRT), catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), and accidental remove of VADs in both COVID-19 positive and COVID-19 free patients. Successive analysis was conducted comparing COVID-19 positive patients with COVID-19 free with inverse probability propensity score weights using simple regression to account for these two confounders (peripheral tip as central/peripheral and hospitalization as no/yes). Methods: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study collected data from seven hospitals in Lombardy during the pandemic period from February 21st to May 31st 2020. Results: A total of 2206 VADs were evaluated, 1107 (50.2%) of which were inserted in COVID-19 patients. In COVID-19 cohort the first choice was Long Peripheral Cannula in 388 patients (35.1%) followed by Midline Catheter in 385 (34.8%). The number of “central tip” VADs inserted in COVID-free inpatients and COVID-19 positive were similar (307 vs 334). We recorded 42 (1.9%) CRT; 32 (79.2%) were observed in COVID-19 patients. A total of 19 CRBSI were diagnosed; 15 (78.95%) were observed in COVID-19. Accidental removals were the more represented complication with 123 cases, 85 (69.1%) of them were in COVID-19. COVID-19 significantly predicted occurrence of CRT (OR = 2.00(1.85–5.03); p < 0.001), CRSB (OR = 3.82(1.82–8.97); p < 0.001), and Accidental Removal (OR = 2.39(1.80–3.20); p < 0.001) in our propensity score weighted models. Conclusions: CRT, CRBSI, and accidental removal are significantly more frequent in COVID-19 patients. Accidental removals are the principal complication, for this reason, the use of subcutaneously anchored securement is recommended for a shorter period than usual.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Nephrology,Surgery

Cited by 23 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3