FLOW: Flow dysfunction of hemodialysis vascular access: A randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of surveillance of arteriovenous fistulas and grafts

Author:

Zomer Bianca12ORCID,Ruiter Matthijs S3ORCID,Dekker Friedo W4,Goertz Ellen GD2,de Haan Michiel W5,Hemmelder Marc HH1,Hiligsmann Mickaël JC6,Konijn Wanda S7,van Loon Magda M2,Maessen José MC8,Mees Barend ME2,Rotmans Joris I9ORCID,Schurink Geert WH2,Vleugels Marie-José JPJ2,Snoeijs Maarten GJ2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands

2. Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands

3. Kennisinstituut, Federation Medical Specialists, Utrecht, The Netherlands

4. Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leids University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands

5. Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands

6. Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands

7. Nierpatienten Vereniging Nederland, Bussum, The Netherlands

8. CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands

9. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Leids University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands

Abstract

Introduction: It is assumed that identification and correction of asymptomatic stenoses in the vascular access circuit will prevent thrombosis that would require urgent intervention to continue hemodialysis treatment. However, the evidence base for this assumption is limited. Recent international clinical practice guidelines reach different conclusions on the use of surveillance for vascular access flow dysfunction and recommend further research to inform clinical practice. Methods: The FLOW trial is a double-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled trial with a 1:1 individual participant treatment allocation ratio over two study arms. In the intervention group, only symptomatic vascular access stenoses detected by clinical monitoring are treated, whereas in the comparison group asymptomatic stenoses detected by surveillance using monthly dilution flow measurements are treated as well. Hemodialysis patients with a functional arteriovenous vascular access are enrolled. The primary outcome is the access-related intervention rate that will be analyzed using a general linear model with Poisson distribution. Secondary outcomes include patient satisfaction, access-related serious adverse events, and quality of the surveillance process. A cost effectiveness analysis and budget impact analysis will also be conducted. The study requires 828 patient-years of follow-up in 417 participants to detect a difference of 0.25 access-related interventions per year between study groups. Discussion: As one of the largest randomized controlled trials assessing the clinical impact of vascular access surveillance using a strong double-blinded study design, we believe the FLOW trial will provide much-needed evidence to improve vascular access care for hemodialysis patients.

Funder

ZonMw

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Nephrology,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3