What’s in a Badge? A Computational Reproducibility Investigation of the Open Data Badge Policy in One Issue of Psychological Science

Author:

Crüwell Sophia12ORCID,Apthorp Deborah34ORCID,Baker Bradley J.5ORCID,Colling Lincoln6ORCID,Elson Malte78ORCID,Geiger Sandra J.9ORCID,Lobentanzer Sebastian10,Monéger Jean1112ORCID,Patterson Alex13ORCID,Schwarzkopf D. Samuel1415,Zaneva Mirela16ORCID,Brown Nicholas J. L.17ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Meta-Research Innovation Center Berlin (METRIC-B), QUEST Center for Transforming Biomedical Research, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin

2. Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge

3. School of Psychology, University of New England

4. School of Computing, Australian National University

5. Department of Sport and Recreation Management, Temple University

6. School of Psychology, University of Sussex

7. Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum

8. Horst Görtz Institute for IT Security, Ruhr University Bochum

9. Environmental Psychology, Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna

10. Institute for Computational Biomedicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany

11. Department of Psychology, University of Poitiers

12. Research Center on Cognition and Learning, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) 7295

13. Sheffield Methods Institute, The University of Sheffield

14. School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Auckland

15. Experimental Psychology, University College London

16. Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford

17. Department of Psychology, Linnaeus University

Abstract

In April 2019, Psychological Science published its first issue in which all Research Articles received the Open Data badge. We used that issue to investigate the effectiveness of this badge, focusing on the adherence to its aim at Psychological Science: sharing both data and code to ensure reproducibility of results. Twelve researchers of varying experience levels attempted to reproduce the results of the empirical articles in the target issue (at least three researchers per article). We found that all 14 articles provided at least some data and six provided analysis code, but only one article was rated to be exactly reproducible, and three were rated as essentially reproducible with minor deviations. We suggest that researchers should be encouraged to adhere to the higher standard in force at Psychological Science. Moreover, a check of reproducibility during peer review may be preferable to the disclosure method of awarding badges.

Funder

Economic and Social Research Council

Ministerium für Kultur und Wissenschaft des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Psychology

Reference47 articles.

1. How to Automatically Document Data With the codebook Package to Facilitate Data Reuse

2. Reactivation of Previous Experiences in a Working Memory Task

3. Psychological Science Stepping Up a Level

4. Blohowiak B. B., Cohoon J., de-Wit L., Eich E., Farach F. J., Hasselman F., Holcombe A. O., Humphreys M., Lewis M., Nosek B. A., Peirce J., Spies J. R., Seto C., Bowman S., Green D., Nilsonne G., Grahe J., Wykstra S., Hofelich Mohr A. Lowrey O. (2022, February 4). Badges to acknowledge open practices. OSF. https://osf.io/tvyxz

5. Computational Reproducibility via Containers in Psychology

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3