Using Latent Profile Analysis to Understand Health Practitioners’ Attitudes Toward Voluntary Assisted Dying

Author:

Lizzio-Wilson Morgana12ORCID,Thomas Emma F.2,Louis Winnifred R.3ORCID,Crane Monique F.4,Kho Madison4ORCID,Molenberghs Pascal5,Wibisono Susilo3ORCID,Minto Kiara6,Amiot Catherine E.7,Decety Jean8,Breen Lauren J.910ORCID,Noonan Kerrie11,Forbat Liz12,Allen Felicity13

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, The University of Exeter, Exeter, UK

2. College of Education, Psychology, and Social Work, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia

3. School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

4. Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia

5. Institute for Social Neuroscience, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia

6. School of Historical and Philosophical Inquiry, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

7. Département de Psychologie, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada

8. Department of Psychology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

9. Curtin enAble Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia

10. School of Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia

11. Death Literacy Institute, University of Western Sydney, Penrith South, NSW, Australia

12. Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK

13. Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, NT, Australia

Abstract

Prior work has documented considerable diversity among health practitioners regarding their support for voluntary assisted dying (VAD). We examined whether their attitudes are characterised by different combinations of personal support, normative support by other health practitioners, and whether they are predisposed to vicariously experience others’ emotions (i.e., empathy). We also examined whether these profiles experienced different mental health outcomes (i.e., burnout and posttraumatic stress) in relation to VAD. To test this, 104 Australian health practitioners were surveyed after VAD was legalised in Victoria, Australia in 2019. Results indicated that practitioners’ attitudes were characterised by three profiles: 1) strong personal and normative support (strong VAD supporters), 2) moderate personal and normative support (moderate VAD supporters), and 3) lower personal and normative support (apprehensive practitioners). However, each profile reported similar mental health outcomes. Findings suggest that the normative environments in which health practitioners operate may explain their diverse attitudes on VAD.

Funder

Australian Research Council Discovery Project

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Life-span and Life-course Studies,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Health (social science)

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3