The Current State of Non-Invasive Measurement of Intracranial Pressure in Patients with Craniosynostosis: A Systematic Review

Author:

Patel Viren1ORCID,Lu Quan2ORCID,Fodor R’ay1,Patel Niyant3

Affiliation:

1. The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

2. Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, USA

3. Akron Children’s Hospital, Akron OH, USA

Abstract

Introduction: Despite being invasive, direct measurements remain the gold standard to measure intra-cranial pressure (ICP) in patients with craniosynostosis. However, there has been persistent effort to develop non-invasive modalities to measure ICP, possibly avoiding some of the risks of direct measurements. Here, we conduct a systematic review of the evidence behind various non-invasive modalities to monitor ICP in patients with craniosynostosis. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases to identify studies describing the use of non-invasive ICP measurements in patients with craniosynostosis. Studies were included if they assessed a non-invasive method of ICP monitoring against a direct/invasive ICP monitoring technique in patients with craniosynostosis. Non-English and non-human studies were excluded. Results: A total of 735 studies were screened, of which 52 were included in the study. Nine methods of non-invasive ICP measurement were identified, with varying sensitivities and specificities in detecting elevated ICP. Specifically, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and ocular ultrasonography demonstrated ability to accurately measure ICP when compared to direct measurements. Conclusion: Here, we present the first systemic-review of the current literature surrounding non-invasive modalities to measure ICP in patients with craniosynostosis. While direct measurement remains the gold-standard, multiple reviewed modalities have shown promise in accurately measuring ICP. Of these, OCT has the most rigorous evidence supporting its use. Ocular sonography has also shown promise, albeit without as robust evidence supporting its use. Regardless, further investigation is required before any modality is able to obviate the need for invasive, direct measurements.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3