Scoping Review of Healthcare Disparities in Treatment of Craniosynostosis: Assessing Impacts of Race, Insurance, and Socioeconomic Status

Abstract

Background: Racial and socioeconomic factors persist as barriers to timely diagnosis and treatment for children with craniosynostosis, contributing to inequitable care. This scoping review aims to better understand how disparities influence differences in services, approach, and outcomes for patients undergoing surgical corrections for craniosynostosis. Methods: We conducted a PRISMA systematic review of all articles published between 2003 and 2023 within PubMed/Medline, Embase, and a Scopus cited review. Variables of interest included sociodemographic factors such as race, socioeconomic status (SES), and insurance status, and measurements of treatment access or outcomes within craniosynostosis surgical repair. Results: The final analysis included 28 studies, of which 21 studies examined race, 13 examined insurance status, and 5 examined household income or other socioeconomic factors. Overall, non-White, minority patients, patients with Medicaid or government-funded insurance, and patients from lower SES were more likely to experience delays in diagnosis and presentation for surgery compared to White and privately-insured patients. Black and Hispanic patients and patients with public insurance were more likely to undergo open cranial vault reconstruction (CVR) at an older age and experience longer total surgery time, increasing perioperative complication risk, compared to patients who underwent endoscopic procedures. Sociodemographic factors including non-White race, lower SES, and being underinsured or uninsured predisposed patients to the more expensive CVR procedure, increased hospital length of stay (LOS), and a higher rate of readmission, accumulating to greater total cost of care. Conclusion: Significant disparities continue to exist in craniosynostosis management. It is still unknown whether these discrepancies in the type of operation lead to significant clinical differences in neurocognitive outcomes, revision operations, or patient/parent satisfaction with appearance. This study highlights gaps in the current body of knowledge to better inform future aeas of investigation to ensure the best outcomes for all children born with craniosynostosis regardless of patient demographic.