Development and validation of the Reward Deficiency Syndrome Questionnaire (RDSQ-29)

Author:

Kótyuk Eszter1,Urbán Róbert1,Hende Borbála12,Richman Mara1,Magi Anna12,Király Orsolya1,Barta Csaba3,Griffiths Mark D4,Potenza Marc N567,Badgaiyan Rajendra D8,Blum Kenneth9,Demetrovics Zsolt110ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary

2. Doctoral School of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary

3. Department of Molecular Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary

4. International Gaming Research Unit, Psychology Department, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK

5. Departments of Psychiatry, Neuroscience and Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA

6. Connecticut Council on Problem Gambling, Wethersfield, CT, USA

7. Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, CT, USA

8. Department of Psychiatry, Ichan School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA

9. Division of Addiction Research & Education, Center for Psychiatry, Medicine, & Primary Care (Office of the Provost), Western University Health Sciences, Pomona, CA, USA

10. Centre of Excellence in Responsible Gaming, University of Gibraltar, Gibraltar

Abstract

Background: The reward deficiency syndrome (RDS) integrates psychological, neurological, and genetic factors of addictive, impulsive, and compulsive behaviors. However, to date, no instrument has been validated to assess the RDS construct. Aims: The present study developed and tested a tool to assess RDS. Methods: Data were collected on two college and university samples. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were performed on Sample 1 ( N = 1726), and confirmatory analysis was conducted on an independent sample ( N = 253). Impulsivity and sensation-seeking were assessed. Results: Based on EFAs, a 29-item Reward Deficiency Syndrome Questionnaire (RDSQ-29) was developed, containing four subscales (lack of sexual satisfaction, activity, social concerns, and risk-seeking behavior). CFA indicated good fit (comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.941; Tucker–Lewis index (TLI) = 0.933; root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.068). Construct validity analysis showed strong relationship between sensation-seeking and the RDS scale. Conclusion: The RDSQ-29 is an adequate scale assessing psychological and behavioral aspects of RDS. The RDSQ-29 assesses psychological and behavioral characteristics that may contribute to addictions generally.

Funder

New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology

Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office

National Center for Responsible Gaming

magyar tudományos akadémia számítástechnikai és automatizálási kutatóintézet

State of Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services

Institute of Medical Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Pathobiochemistry, Semmelweis University

National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities

Hungarian Academy of Sciences

Connecticut Council on Problem Gambling

new National Excellence Program of the Ministry of Human Capacities

Semmelweis University

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Psychiatry and Mental health,Pharmacology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3