Digital tools to support the maintenance of physical activity in people with long-term conditions: A scoping review

Author:

Clarkson Paul123ORCID,Stephenson Aoife4,Grimmett Chloe15,Cook Katherine6,Clark Carol7,Muckelt Paul E13,O’Gorman Philip4,Saynor Zoe8,Adams Jo123,Stokes Maria1235,McDonough Suzanne14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

2. National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration Wessex, Southampton, UK

3. Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis Research Versus Arthritis, Southampton, UK

4. School of Physiotherapy, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland

5. National Institute for Health Research, Southampton Biomedical Research Unit, Southampton, UK

6. Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, School of Health and Care Professions, University of Winchester, Winchester, UK

7. Department of Rehabilitation and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK

8. Physical Activity, Health and Rehabilitation Thematic Research Group, Faculty of Science and Health, School of Sport, Health and Exercise Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK

Abstract

Objective This scoping review aimed to bring together and identify digital tools that support people with one or more long-term conditions to maintain physical activity and describe their components and theoretical underpinnings. Methods Searches were conducted in Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Medline, EMBASE, IEEE Xplore, PsycINFO, Scopus, Google Scholar and clinical trial databases, for studies published between 2009 and 2019, across a range of long-term conditions. Screening and data extraction was undertaken by two independent reviewers and the Preferred Reporting Items for Scoping Reviews guidelines informed the review's conduct and reporting. Results A total of 38 results were identified from 34 studies, with the majority randomised controlled trials or protocols, with cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity the most common long-term conditions. Comorbidities were reported in >50% of studies but did not clearly inform intervention development. Most digital tools were web-browser-based ± wearables/trackers, telerehabilitation tools or gaming devices/components. Mobile device applications and combination short message service/activity trackers/wearables were also identified. Most interventions were supported by a facilitator, often for goal setting/feedback and/or monitoring. Physical activity maintenance outcomes were mostly reported at 9 months or 3 months post-intervention, while theoretical underpinnings were commonly social cognitive theory, the transtheoretical model and the theory of planned behaviour. Conclusions This review mapped the literature on a wide range of digital tools and long-term conditions. It identified the increasing use of digital tools, in combination with human support, to help people with long-term conditions, to maintain physical activity, commonly for under a year post-intervention. Clear gaps were the lack of digital tools for multimorbid long-term conditions, longer-term follow-ups, understanding participant's experiences and informs future questions around effectiveness.

Funder

NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Wessex

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Information Management,Computer Science Applications,Health Informatics,Health Policy

Reference117 articles.

1. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour

2. World Health Organization. Physical activity. https://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/pa/en/. (2019, accessed 15th November 2019).

3. World Health Organisation (WHO). Physical activity fact sheet https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-HEP-HPR-RUN-2021.2. (2021, accessed 30 January 2022).

4. Office for Health Improvement and Disparities. Public health profiles. https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/profile/physical-activity/data#page/1 (2022, accessed 30 January 2022).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3