Affiliation:
1. University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg
2. University of California, Irvine, USA
3. Hertie School, Germany
Abstract
This article analyzes cross-national and longitudinal variations in the incorporation of nonhuman animals into country constitutions and legislation. We argue that incorporation follows from the scientific rationalization and human rights-based ontological elaboration of nonhuman animals in world society, carried by a growing number of intergovernmental agreements and international nongovernmental organizations (INGOs). To test our ideas, we use event-history analyses on original data from 195 countries for the period 1972–2020. The models of constitutional incorporation show mixed results, with positive effects from human rights and INGOs but negative effects from science and intergovernmental agreements. The models of legislative incorporation show consistent positive effects from world factors, even when controlling for a range of domestic factors. Legal incorporation suggests an extension of the boundaries of “society,” driven by the rising prominence of highly rationalized and elaborated models of nonhuman animals, replete with dignity, sentience, and even tentative forms of rights and personhood.
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Sociology and Political Science
Reference93 articles.
1. Survival and Event History Analysis
2. Laying Down the Law? Interest Group Influence on State Adoption of Animal Cruelty Felony Laws
3. American Medical Veterinary Association (AMVA) (2020) Veterinarian’s oath. Available at: https://www.avma.org/policies/veterinarians-oath (accessed 10 December 2020).
4. Traversing the Gap between Religion and Animal Rights: Framing and Networks as a Conceptual Bridge
5. Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany (2002) Article 20(a).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献