Intraoperative midflexion medial laxity using navigation affects patient expectations following posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty

Author:

Hasegawa Masahiro1ORCID,Tone Shine1,Naito Yohei1,Sudo Akihiro1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu City 514-8507, Japan

Abstract

Background Patient satisfaction and expectations are now recognized as an outcome measure for successful total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to determine which factors including soft tissue balance during surgery affect patient satisfaction and expectations after TKA. Methods A total of 135 patients (157 knees) with knee osteoarthritis who underwent primary TKA with a posterior stabilized design were studied. After implantation of all components, varus/valgus laxity of the knee was measured intraoperatively with the knee at 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° guided by an image-free navigation system. Factors that affected patient satisfaction and expectations, including lateral and medial laxities, were evaluated using the 2011 Knee Society score. Results The mean intraoperative lateral laxity was 1.1°, 1.6°, 0.9°, 1.3°, and 1.7° with the knee at 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120°, respectively. The mean intraoperative medial laxity was 1.1°, 1.4°, 1.1°, 1.1°, and 1.7° with the knee at 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120°, respectively. Patient satisfaction after TKA correlated positively with symptom (R = 0.61, p < 0.01) and functional activity (R = 0.47, p < 0.01) scores. Patient expectations after TKA weakly positively correlated with symptom (R = 0.29, p < 0.01) and functional activity (R = 0.20, p = 0.01) scores, and weakly negatively with medial laxity at 30° (R = −0.21, p < 0.01). Conclusion Midflexion medial laxity was associated with worse patient expectations after TKA. Avoiding medial laxity could be one of the important techniques during TKA.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3