Real-Time Objective Assessment of Knot Quality With a Portable Tensiometer Is Superior to Execution Time for Assessment of Laparoscopic Knot-Tying Performance

Author:

Ritter E. Matt1,McClusky David A.,Gallagher A. G.,Smith C. Daniel2

Affiliation:

1. Emory Simulation Training and Robotics (E*STAR) Lab, Endosurgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; NCA Medical Simulation Center, Norman M. Rich Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD.; Surgical Simulation, NCA Medical Simulation Center; Norman M. Rich Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD 20814 ().

2. Emory Simulation Training and Robotics (E*STAR) Lab, Endosurgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA

Abstract

Objective: Laparoscopic intracorporeal knot tying is a difficult skill to acquire. Currently, time to complete a knot is the most commonly used metric to assess the acquisition of this skill; however, without a measure of knot quality, time is a poor indicator of skills mastery. Others have shown that knot quality can be accurately assessed with a tensiometer, but obtaining this type of assessment has typically been cumbersome. We investigated a new method of real-time assessment of knot quality that allows for more practical use of knot quality as a performance metric. Methods: Eleven experienced endoscopic surgeons tied 100 intracorporeal knots in a standard box trainer. Each of the knots was immediately tested using the InSpec 2200 benchtop tensiometer (INSTRON, Canton MA) where a knot quality score (KQS) is generated based on the load handling properties of the knotted suture. The execution time was also recorded for each knot. Results: The assessment of all knots ended with one of two end points: knots that slipped (n = 48)or knots that held until the suture broke (n = 52). Knots that slip are generally of poorer quality than those that held. Execution time did not correlate with knot-quality score (r= 0.009, P= .9), and the mean execution time did not differ significantly between slipped and held knots (65 vs 68 seconds, P= .8). No completion time criteria were able to accurately predict slipped versus held knots. The mean KQS difference between held and slipped knots was highly significant (24 vs 12, P< .0001). A knot with a KQS exceeding 20 was nearly 10 times more likely to hold than slip. Conclusion: Time to complete a knot is a poor metric for the objective assessment of intracorporeal knot-tying performance in the absence of a measure of knot quality. Real-time evaluation of the knot quality can accurately distinguish welltied knots from poorly tied knots. This mode of assessment should be incorporated into training curriculum for surgical knot tying.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 49 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3