Full Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy: Safety and Feasibility Analysis of a Multicenter Cohort of 236 Patients

Author:

Alfieri Sergio1,Boggi Ugo2,Butturini Giovanni3,Pietrabissa Andrea4,Morelli Luca2ORCID,Di Sebastiano Pierluigi5,Vistoli Fabio2,Damoli Isacco3,Peri Andrea4,Lapergola Alfonso5,Fiorillo Claudio1,Panaccio Paolo5,Pugliese Luigi4,Ramera Marco3,De Lio Nelide2,Di Franco Gregorio2,Rosa Fausto1,Menghi Roberta1,Doglietto Giovanni Battista1,Quero Giuseppe1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore of Rome, Fondazione Policlinico “A Gemelli” IRCCS of Rome, Rome, Italy

2. Chirurgia Generale Universitaria dell’Ospedale di Cisanello, Pisa, Italy

3. Casa di Cura Pederzoli, Verona, Italy

4. Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy

5. Ospedale “Ss Annunziata,” Chieti, Italy

Abstract

Introduction. Despite the widespread use of the robotic technology, only a few studies with small sample sizes report its application to pancreatic diseases treatment. Our aim is to present the results of a multicenter study on the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy (RDP). Materials and Methods. All RDPs for benign, borderline, and malignant diseases performed in 5 referral centers from 2008 to 2016 were included. Perioperative outcomes were evaluated. Results. Two hundred thirty-six patients were included. Spleen preservation was performed in 114 cases (48.3%). Operative time was 277.8 ± 93.6 minutes. Progressive improvement in operative time was observed over the study period. Conversion rate was 6.3%. Morbidity occurred in 102 cases (43.2%), mainly due to grade A fistulas. Reoperation was required in 10 patients. Postoperatively, 2 patients died of sepsis due to a grade C fistula. Hospital readmission was necessary in 11 cases. A R0 resection was always achieved, with a mean number of 16.2 ± 15 harvested lymph nodes. Conclusion. To our knowledge, this is one of the largest RDP series. Safety and feasibility including the low conversion rate, the high spleen preservation rate, the adequate operative time, and the acceptable morbidity and mortality rates confirm the validity of this technique. Appropriate oncological outcomes have been also obtained.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3