Nurses anaesthetists’ versus patients’ assessment of anxieties in an ambulatory surgery setting

Author:

Arakelian Erebouni1ORCID,Färdig Martin2,Nyholm Lena1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

2. Departement of Neurology Sciences/Neurosurgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

Abstract

Background Failure to assess patients’ anxiety perioperatively by means of a validated instrument makes the assessment arbitrary. Studies are lacking about how well nurse anaesthetists estimate patients’ preoperative worries. Purpose To compare the nurse anaesthetists’ estimations of patients’ preoperative anxieties with the patients’ own assessment of their anxieties. Design Quantitative prospective design. Methods Eighty-five pairs of patients and nurse anaesthetists in two ambulatory surgery units in a university hospital in Sweden were included. Patients’ perioperative anxieties were graded using the Numeric Visual Analogue Anxiety Scale. Results The nurse anaesthetist overestimated the patients’ level of preoperative anxiety in 53% of patients and underestimated patients’ anxieties in 31% of the patients. Consensus was seen in 16% of the pairs. In fifty-six pairs (65%), the difference between the estimation of level of patients’ anxiety according to Numeric Visual Analogue Anxiety Scale was between −3 (overestimation) and +3 levels (underestimation). Median levels of anxiety were estimated as 3 within the patient group and 4 among the nurse anaesthetists. Conclusions Systematic assessment of patients’ level of anxiety could lead to identifying patients with severe anxiety levels and to offer more individualised treatment. The patients’ own estimation must form the basis for the discussion and treatment.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3