Electronic patient-reported outcomes in clinical kidney practice (ePRO Kidney): a process evaluation of educational support for clinicians

Author:

Schick-Makaroff Kara1ORCID,Klarenbach Scott2,Kwon Jae-Yung3,Cohen S. Robin45,Czupryn Joanna6,Lee Loretta6,Pauly Robert2,MacRae Jennifer M.7,Forde Bruce8,Sawatzky Richard91011

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, 4-116 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, 11405-87 Avenue, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada

2. Division of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada

3. School of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada

4. Departments of Oncology and Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

5. Lady Davis Research Institute of the Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada

6. Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada

7. Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

8. Cambian Business Services, Surrey, BC, Canada

9. School of Nursing, Trinity Western University, Langley, BC, Canada

10. Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, St. Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada

11. Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

Abstract

Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly mandated in kidney care to incorporate patients’ perspectives. Objectives: We assessed whether educational support for clinicians using electronic (e)PROs could enhance person-centered care. Design: A process evaluation, using a mixed methods longitudinal comparative concurrent design was undertaken of educational support to clinicians on routine use of ePROs. In two urban home dialysis clinics in Alberta, Canada, patients completed ePROs. At the implementation site, clinicians were provided with ePROs and clinician-oriented education via voluntary workshops. At the non-implementation site, neither were provided. Person-centered care was measured using the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care-20 (PACIC-20). Methods: Longitudinal structural equation models (SEMs) compared change in overall PACIC scores. The interpretive description approach, using thematic analysis of qualitative data, further evaluated processes of implementation. Results: Data were collected from questionnaires completed by 543 patients, 4 workshops, 15 focus groups, and 37 interviews. There was no overall difference in person-centered care throughout the study, including after delivery of workshops. The longitudinal SEMs revealed substantial individual-level variability in overall PACIC trajectories. However, there was no improvement at the implementation site and no difference between the sites during both the pre- and post-workshop periods. Similar results were obtained for each PACIC domain. Qualitative analysis provided insights into why there was no substantial difference between sites: (1) clinicians wanted to see kidney symptoms, not quality of life, (2) workshops were tailored to clinicians’ educational needs, not patients’ needs, and (3) variable use of ePRO data by clinicians. Conclusion: Training clinicians on use of ePROs is complex and likely only part of what is required to enhance person-centered care. Registration: NCT03149328. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03149328

Funder

Can-SOLVE CKD - KRESCENT

Canadian Institutes for Health Research

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3