Affiliation:
1. Centre of Advance powertrain and Fuels, Brunel University, London, UK
2. Mahle Powertrain, Northampton, UK
Abstract
The automotive industry must mitigate climate change by reducing vehicle carbon emissions and promoting sustainable transportation through technical solutions and innovations. Biofuels are seen as a solution to reduce CO2 emissions, but they may affect fuel performance and emissions. Second-generation biogasoline mixed with ethanol has proven that it can be introduced as a drop-in fuel with the same performance and tailpipe emissions at the same level as fossil fuels. However, particulate matter (PM) emissions are significantly higher than fossil fuels. This study aims to experimentally investigate the effect of port and direct fuel injections on the PM emissions in a boosted spark ignition (SI) engine fuelled by Euro 6 standard biofuel with a 99 octane number blended with 20% ethanol compared to a fossil fuel baseline. The single-cylinder SI engine was equipped with two fuel injectors, a direct injector and a port fuel injector, and operated with externally boosted air. The split injection ratio was adjusted from 100% direct injection (DI) to 100% port fuel injection (PFI) to investigate the combustion characteristics and particulate emissions (PM) at different engine loads and speeds. The results indicate that by changing 100% DI to 80% PFI, PM emissions numbers between particle sizes of 23 and 1000 nm were dropped by 96.56% at a low load operation of 4.6 bar IMEP for the 99 RON E20 biogasoline and by 84% for the 95 RON E10 fossil fuel while maintaining the same indicated thermal efficiency and a similar level of other emissions. However, at a higher load above 10 bar IMEP, it was found that full DI operation reduced particulate numbers (PN) by 64% and 38% for 99 RON E20 biogasoline and 95 RON E10 fossil fuel at 20 bar IMEP, respectively, and enabled more stable operation at 3000 rpm with higher load operation regions.
Reference46 articles.
1. Department for Energy Security and Net Zero and Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. Net zero strat build back greener. HM Government, 2021. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6194dfa4d3bf7f0555071b1b/net-zero-strategy-beis.pdf
2. Comparative life cycle assessment of conventional combustion engine vehicle, battery electric vehicle and fuel cell electric vehicle in Nepal
3. Optimal design and allocation of electrified vehicles and dedicated charging infrastructure for minimum life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and cost
4. Xie Y, Dallmann T, Muncrief R. Heavy-duty zero-emission vehicles pace and opportunities for a rapid global transition. ZEV Transition Council, 2022. https://theicct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/globalhvsZEV-hdzev-pace-transition-may22.pdf
5. The Future of Hydrogen