Understanding Risk Communication Through Patient Narratives About Complex Antithrombotic Therapies

Author:

Andreas Dorothy C.1,Abraham Neena S.2,Naik Aanand D.2,Street Richard L.3,Sharf Barbara F.4

Affiliation:

1. Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas, USA,

2. Houston Center of Quality of Care and Utilization Studies at Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA

3. Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas, USA, Houston Center of Quality of Care and Utilization Studies at Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA

4. Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas, USA

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore how patients use narratives to create coherent understandings of risks associated with complex antithrombotic therapies. We led four focus groups consisting of patients older than 65 years of age who had a diagnosis of cardiovascular disease and were using a prescription for cardioprotective agents, such as aspirin, anticoagulants, and/or antiplatelets. The participants’ stories were retrospective accounts about physician and patient interactions and adverse events organized in the plot structure of a trial-and-error story. The trial-and-error narrative structure emphasizes patients’ idiosyncrasies and reasons why they expect to experience adverse events from changes in treatment. Any fears that they might have had about these risks were mitigated by physician expertise, patient responsibility, and medical technology. Patients who expressed concern about not having sufficient access to medical expertise (e.g., physicians, laboratory tests) seemed less willing to accept risks. The trial-and-error risk narratives helped patients deal with ambiguity and uncertainty about the outcomes of their therapies, and revealed patients’ orientations to the risks they faced.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference40 articles.

1. Babrow, A.S., Kline, K.N. & Rawlins, W.K. ( 2005). Narrating problems and problematising narratives: Linking problematic integration and narrative theory in telling stories about our health. In L. M. Harter, P. M. Japp, & C. S. Beck (Eds.), Narratives, health, and healing: Communication theory, research, and practice (pp. 31-52). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

2. Babrow, A.S. & Mattson, M. ( 2003). Theorizing about health communication. In T. Thompson, A. Dorsey, K. Miller, & R. Parrott (Eds.), Handbook of health communication (pp. 35-61). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

3. Beck, C.S. ( 2005). Becoming the story: Narrative as collaborative, social enactments of individual, relational, and public identities. In L. M. Harter, P. M. Japp, & C. S. Beck (Eds.), Narratives, health, and healing, (pp. 61-82). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

4. Information Seeking and Avoiding in Health Contexts

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3